Response of the United Church of Zambia to the Conflict Generated by the Barotseland Agreement and the Associated 2010-2011 Shooting Incidents Involving the Linyungandambo Activists
Keywords:
Barotseland Agreement, Church, Conflict, Government, Reconciliation, United Church of Zambia, Violence, Zambia.
Abstract
This article investigates the role of the United Church of Zambia (UCZ) in fostering national reconciliation amidst the conflicts arising from the Barotseland Agreement between 2010 and 2011. The purpose of this study was to enhance understanding of the UCZ's impact on helping to prevent socio-economic and political conflicts from escalating into violence. Employing a qualitative methodology, the research involved individual and group interviews with diverse respondents including members of the Barotseland Agreement activists among whom were also members of the UCZ; current leaders of the UCZ; some political leaders and scholars who were also members of the UCZ during the conflict as well as leaders of the Church Mother Bodies. Data was analyzed through simultaneous coding, content analysis, and thematic analysis. The findings revealed that the UCZ largely failed to engage meaningfully in the reconciliation process, exhibiting partiality and a lack of strategic planning, which resulted in its perceived role as a silent bystander during the conflict induced by the Barotseland Agreement. The study identified inefficiencies in the church's prophetic voice, suggesting that it did not adequately fulfill its moral obligation to promote peace and justice as authorized by its own Constitution. Ultimately, this work aims to contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the UCZ's potential in peacebuilding and its capacity to influence national peace and reconciliation issues in Zambia. The study ends by making several recommendations including: the need for UCZ to adopt a policy of neutrality during national conflicts, develop a strategic plan for national reconciliation, and develop a platform for national dialogue with the government.
Published
2025-02-17
Section
Articles